1910s Larson Brothers-made Fancy Flatback Mandolin
This beautiful, crack-free, fancy-pants mandolin was made by the Larson Brothers in Chicago somewhere between 1900 and 1920. It most looks like the mid-teens models I'm familiar with in the Leland line, though it also looks like many Stahl-branded Larson mandos from the time, too. It is a bit fancier than average, with pearl-inlaid trim around the top edge and soundhole and binding on the neck.
It's built like most Larson flatbacks with a canted-top in bowlback fashion and a firm but light build. There are two ladder braces below the soundhole and one above (in typical flatback fashion) and the back and sides feel a little more "rigid" than most flatback mandolins from the time while the top is a little more flexible. This makes absolute sense acoustically (it's how most classical guitars function), but most builders were just building for lightness' sake in the same era. The difference with this type of construction is that notes are a little fuller, rounder, and punch a bit more. This "same mandolin" (in general build and bracing) built in the super-lightweight Harmony or Regal mold yields a less-focused, airier sound.
This came in pretty good shape but needed one top brace brace reglue (the other had been sloppily-glued but was pat), a fret level/dress, and a replacement bridge as the original was broken. The "new" bridge is a 1920s one from my parts-bin and I've compensated it. The neck is essentially straight (the level/dress took any minor warp out via the frets), the strings are 32w-9, and the action is spot-on at a hair under 1/16" at the 12th fret.
Specs are: 12 15/16" scale, 1 1/8" nut width, 15/16" string spacing at the nut, 1 9/16" spacing at the bridge, 9 1/8" body width, 2 1/4" body depth at the endblock.
Woods are: solid spruce top, solid Brazilian rosewood back, sides, and headstock veneer, mahogany neck, and ebony fretboard and bridge. The bridge has a bone insert and the nut is bone, too.
While there's plenty of use-wear and finish aging, the instrument itself is in good order. It does have a slight sunken spot at the treble side of the pickguard where braces were (presumably) detached for a long while. They're pat, now, though. I find that a lot of mandolin tops tend to distort slightly where they have these glued-on, recessed celluloid pickguards.
As unlikely as it is, the fretboard has the barest whiff of a radius to it. The frets are very small and thin, just like most mandolin wire at the time. It's bound in white celluloid and the dots are pearl.
How about all that bling, right? The pearl has yellowed finish over it but it still catches the light like crazy (something you can see in the video clip pretty well).
The engraved tailpiece cover is a nice touch.
A fancy backstrip adds a classy look against that pretty plank of rosewood.
The tuners are recessed into the headstock. I added a couple of screws to their baseplates (which are often left un-screwed-down at the factory) to keep them snug.
One trait that seems not duplicated by other factories at the time is the completely-bound heel area on the back of Larson mandolins. The back overlaps the heel in this case.
The rosewood on the sides is gorgeous, too.
While it's not traditional, I tend to add strap buttons at the tailpiece on old mandolins while I'm working on them since most players are going to hang a strap anyhow. This is better than adding another hole later that can't be hidden.
Comments
https://reverb.com/uk/item/9862771-supertone-1920-s-flat-back-mandolin-free-shipping-3411
There was another on Reverb with no frets that was also being sold as a Supertone/Harmony but the top example does still show the late 1920s Supertone label. The Supertone catalogue page from the 1920s show this mandolin for sale at $14-95- the next one down from that carved Viol model.
https://reverb.com/item/432533-supertone-a-style-mandolin-1930-natural-w-case
https://reverb.com/au/item/9981946-supertone-mandolin-20-s-30-s
https://www.google.com/search?q=harmony+flatback+mandolin+wildwood&rlz=1C5CHFA_enUS773US773&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjhg53cy4_cAhXJMd8KHTJVDEEQ_AUICygC&biw=1280&bih=637#imgrc=_
Here's the Larson flatbacks:
https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C5CHFA_enUS773US773&biw=1280&bih=637&tbm=isch&sa=1&ei=Jg9CW7qjEYed_QamyIrwAw&q=larson+flatback+mandolin+wildwood&oq=larson+flatback+mandolin+wildwood&gs_l=img.3...145960.146471.0.146653.6.6.0.0.0.0.105.491.5j1.6.0....0...1c.1.64.img..1.0.0....0.DGAt5TcnOrQ
Not all of the images get you to the right places, but you can pull them up and count the details and draw your own conclusions. If you've had these brands side-by-side (like I have, many times), you can tell immediately that they're quite a bit different in the way they're actually built -- despite looking very similar.
On that basis, I am more than happy to accept that it is from Larson but this just goes to show how outwardly similar instruments from this era can be. We know that inlays were often made by third parties and decorative styles could be replicated by various makers on extremely similar instruments. I do have the Larson book and can see the aspects that point towards Larson. Unfortunately, the Supertone catalogue page is a drawing and we don't get to see the back of the Harmony made instrument. There's no doubt they are very similar from a cosmetic point of view but not identical when it comes to the respective heels and the binding and that is the crucial difference while as you further mention, side by side, there are build differences as well. However, it's a great instrument irrespective of the maker which is clearly Larson in this case.
Harmony and Regal instruments are even closer in build except for a few details and often general sizing. Oscar Schmidt also made some models that are VERY close to Harmony designs as well, but the heel shape is always wrong on them and the finish type is a little different. If you had someone who hadn't handled all of them judge just from photos, he/she might conclude that they were all the same maker.
Fortunately I've handled about dozen or so Larson flatbacks and several dozens of the other makers' efforts, so it's pretty easy for me to figure out what's what. In the hand they're different in much more obvious ways.
As far as the Supertone label goes -- Sears used some much-nicer-grade makes for their upscale models early in the line and then pretty-much doubled down on their "house" Harmony-made instruments by the '20s.
Bowlback mandolins are similarly painful to suss-out the maker -- and often even harder for folks to figure-out in photos as they're even closer in spec.
As far as Regal/L&H mandolin instruments -- Regal seems to have made all of the L&H output EXCEPT for the fancy carved-top models starting around 1915 on the mandolin-side of things. The Washburn/AmCon flatback/bowlback models are direct "sames" as ones from the Regal catalogs in-hand and in the invisible mind of the internet, too...!!!
Because L&H+Regal from 1895-1930 are like an old married couple, it's painfully-hard to figure-out where one begins and the other ends until the L&H brands names go belly-up in the depression... and then the Washburn brand gets used on all SORTS of stuff just to make us all crazier.
Thanks!